Good 'red tape' vs. regulatory rigmarole
By Jon Sanders
View in your browser.
A bill before the North Carolina House would institute
periodic review and expiration of North Carolina's "more than 22,500 permanent
administrative rules," the Wilmington Star-News reported. House
Bill 74 would set up a timeline for rolling expirations of rules, from 2016
through 2019, if they are not readopted in the interim. It would further stipulate
that, after a rule is either adopted, readopted, or amended, it will remain in
effect for only 10 years.
Periodic review of state rules is a much-needed reform I discussed in my first Carolina
Cronyism report and in my chapter on "The Next Steps on Regulatory
Reform" in the John Locke Foundation's policy book First
in Freedom: Transforming Ideas Into Consequences for North Carolina.
In that chapter, I explain that rules carry the full force of law, with
penalties such as fines and even jail for violations of them, but they are
devised by bureaucrats who aren't directly accountable to the voters. This
power is delegated to them from the legislature, but it can be abused, and as I
discuss the system,
North Carolina's regulatory process
is still internally biased toward increasing regulation, ever growing the
regulatory burden that is slowing industry and hampering economic recovery. The
state's economic climate is helped by good rules that give a clear picture of
the legal framework for conducting business in the many enterprises within the
state. Nevertheless, it is harmed when rules appear arbitrary, multiply and
compound, persist after practical obsolescence, and work more to help the
regulating agencies rather than benefit citizens and businesses.
Periodic review and automatic expiration without readoption
or amendment would appear to help address those concerns. First in Freedom offers several more ways, including making the
regulatory process more transparent, strengthening the Rules Review Commission,
injecting full cost/benefit analysis, bringing REINS to North Carolina (also
recently discussed in this
newsletter), applying a no-more-stringent standard, reforming
administrative appeals, and adding small-business flexibility analysis.
The Star-News reported differing receptions for HB 74:
Cameron Moore, governmental affairs
director for BASE, supports a review of the rules. BASE represents about 12,000
members involved in the real estate and development industry in Southeastern
"Any kind of look at rules and regulations is certainly worthwhile,"
Moore said. "This discussion needs to happen."
But environmentalists had a harsher reaction. They were concerned the bill adds
"red tape" and makes regulation more difficult.
"Over the past decade, rule-making has become an increasingly complex and
lengthy process that is easily stalled and delayed by anyone that objects to a
new rule," said Todd Miller, executive director of the N.C. Coastal
Federation. "This bill will require that all existing rules be re-adopted,
and if someone objects, that means that an agency or commission will be tied in
knots trying to get standards back in place."
What 'red tape' means
Notwithstanding the environmentalists' complaint about HB 74's Red Tape That
Makes Regulation More Difficult, cutting government regulations is the complete
antithesis to adding red tape. Red tape
is government regulation. According to the Online Etymology
Dictionary, the meaning and origin of the expression "red tape"
rigmarole," 1736, in reference to the red tape formerly used in Great
Britain (and the American colonies) for binding up legal and other official
compiles several definitions of "red tape," all of which refer to
entangling bureaucracy, and none of which refer to stymieing bureaucracy.
Perhaps no one has yet informed Dictionary.com of the green version of red
tape. For those inclined, the definition of rigmarole is also
worth a gander.
If there is a red tape that actually binds bureaucracy and makes government
regulation more difficult, then let it be called the good red tape. I would
welcome it a hundred times over that "excessive bureaucratic rigmarole"
Click here for the Rights &
Regulation Update archive.
Saturday, Feb. 16th, 2013 at 7:00 p.m.
JLF 23rd Anniversary Gala Event
with our special guest Stuart Varney — Fox Business News
JLF 23rd Anniversary Event with
Fox Business News Anchor
Monday, Feb. 18th, 2013 at 12:00 p.m.
Shaftesbury Society Luncheon
with our special guest John Hood
"First In Freedom: Transforming Ideas into Consequences for North Carolina."
Saturday, Feb. 23rd, 2013 at 9:45 am - 8:00 pm
Young Americans for Liberty Convention
with Congressman Walter Jones and Lt. Governor Dan Forest
Advancing the Youth Movement for Liberty
Monday, Feb. 25th, 2013 at 12:00 p.m.
Shaftesbury Society Luncheon
with our special guest Kory Swanson
What Do We Owe Future Generations, If Anything?
Saturday, Mar. 23rd, 2013 at 9:00 - 4:30
with Kenneth Elzinga, University of Virginia, Thomas Nechyba, Duke University, Daniel Hammond, Wake Forest University, William English, Harvard University
"Markets and the Common Good: The Economic Way of Thinking, and Its Limits"